on October 3rd 2017
Published by Doubleday Books
Robert Langdon, Harvard professor of symbology and religious iconology, arrives at the ultramodern Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao to attend a major announcement—the unveiling of a discovery that “will change the face of science forever.” The evening’s host is Edmond Kirsch, a forty-year-old billionaire and futurist whose dazzling high-tech inventions and audacious predictions have made him a renowned global figure. Kirsch, who was one of Langdon’s first students at Harvard two decades earlier, is about to reveal an astonishing breakthrough . . . one that will answer two of the fundamental questions of human existence.
I swear Dan Brown is my soul mate. I want the worlds that he describes in his books. That may be concerning to other people. The last few books have been dark and I love it that way.
I actually find his books to be frustrating to read the first time. I just want to know what the point is. I don’t have time for people beating around the bush. Hint – If you are talking to Robert Langdon just tell him what you have to say. If you hint and hem and haw and say that you’ll tell him the important point at a later time, you aren’t making it through the book.
If you haven’t read the book yet, I’ll just say that I appreciated the way this book played with the formulas of his previous books. If you have read it, I have a lot more to say but first we have to give all the spoiler warnings.
Ok, we’re going to be talking about EXACTLY what happens in the book so turn back now if you don’t want to know.
You’ve been warned…….
…….Still here? Ok.
First of all, let’s talk about how he upended the expectations that he built in the previous books.
- The art doesn’t mean anything except for Winston’s self portrait.
- The church isn’t involved at all at the end.
Seriously, I loved that. What seemed formulaic all through the book – “Here’s another bad priest manipulating a devout follower to kill people” – was all a red herring.
- He’s on the run with a beautiful younger woman AND IT ISN’T ROMANTIC AT ALL. Thank you, thank you, thank you! I am over the idea of young women falling over themselves for the hero of every book.
I do have a question about Ambra’s story though. Her big secret is that she is infertile. Is this a nod to Inferno (in which case it shouldn’t be a surprise at all) or are we living in a universe where the events of Inferno didn’t happen? I loved the ending of Inferno. I actually stood up and cheered. I’m not talking about the ending of the movie version of Inferno which was an absolute abomination. I’m talking about a plague released on the whole world ending of the book. My love of the idea of (SPOILER) that a plague could be released that makes 1/3 of the world infertile leads into my appreciation for the ideas in this book. I’m not a fan of the idea of unlimited human growth nor of the idea that humans have to be the dominant species on Earth. Evolve away!
So, what do we think about the idea of life evolving as a way to control energy? I think it is a cool (no pun intended) idea but I don’t know how viable of an idea it is. As an agnostic/atheist person it doesn’t bother me theologically.
I am a fan of the idea of humans melding with artificial intelligence. Of course, the whole time I was thinking, “And then some fool drops an EMP…” because obviously, I’m a cynic. I would love to live in a utopia of high technology that saves the planet. I’m afraid to see I don’t see it happening though.
I loved him. I don’t even care if you are a murderous rampaging machine. Ok, I sort of care. I don’t mind that he killed his creator. That was probably kind seeing what kind of death he was facing. I’m a veterinarian. Euthanasia is a huge part of my life. I’m not happy about him killing the iman and the rabbi. That was unnecessary. Bad Winston! Somebody is going to have to come up with some laws to control AI that work a bit better than the ones in I, Robot. Maybe add in “humans are free to make their own decisions.” Of course, letting humans make decisions leads to a whole bunch of really bad decisions like Donald Trump. Somebody else needs to take a crack at making laws that don’t get us all locked up.
So what did you think? Do you want this world or not?