The Paul amendment that was designed to defund the National Animal Identification System was defeated. See how your representative voted. I just sent mine an email expressing my deep disappointment with his vote against this amendment. It was polite though! (See previous entry for my new committment to civility)
Voting Yes on the amendment meant that they wanted to defund NAIS. Voting No meant to keep the funding.
In my world then, Yes is good and No is bad.
Can you go over the amendment again? I’m a little confused on what a ‘yes’ vote v. ‘no’ vote is in relation to the bill. It’s probably a lack of food.
Thanks.