Baker Thiefby Claudie Arseneault
Published on June 26, 2018
AdÃ¨le has only one goal: catch the purple-haired thief who broke into her home and stole her exocore, thus proving herself to her new police team. Little does she know, her thief is also the local baker.
Claire owns the Croissant-toi, but while her days are filled with pastries and customers, her nights are dedicated to stealing exocores. These new red gems are heralded as the energy of the future, but she knows the truth: they are made of witchesâ€™ souls.
When her twinâ€”a powerful witch and prime exocore materialâ€”disappears, Claire redoubles in her efforts to investigate. She keeps running into AdÃ¨le, however, and whether or not she can save her sister might depend on their conflicted, unstable, but deepening relationship.
---------------BAKER THIEF is the first in a fantasy series meant to reframe romance tropes within non-romantic relationship and centering aromantic characters. Those who love enemies-to-lovers and superheroes should enjoy the story!
I picked this up because it combined a baker and a fantasy mystery.Â There really isn’t as much baking content as I would have liked because Claude the baker is off being a superhero and keeps needing to close the bakery.
What I Liked:
- This is a fantasy world based in a French worldview.Â The author is from Quebec and it shows in the French blended into this story.Â I don’t know that I’ve seen another book where this is so well combined.Â Place names, official titles, etc are French.
- There are witches in this world but they have been driven underground by persecution in the fairly recent past.Â Nonmagical people think they are safe now because witches are gone.Â Witches are not gone.
- The main character is Claude/Claire.Â They are genderfluid.Â Generally, he is Claude during the day when he is baking and Claire at night when she is a thief.Â That schedule of genders was working well until recently when Claude is starting to regret not being comfortable working during the day as Claire or spending the night as Claude depending on which gender feels most comfortable at the time.
- It tackles issues relating to aromanticism and asexuality.Â There are several characters at different places on the spectrum of aromanticism and asexuality so you don’t get a single point of view of these topics.Â It shows how aromantic people have relationships which is important if readers aren’t familiar with this aspect of queerness.
- The rest of the cast is also very diverse.Â Many genders, sexualities, disabilities, and races are represented.Â It is also very good at body acceptance of various sizes of people.
Things that are slightly off:
- This isn’t the author’s fault but there is a major part of the plot that is very similar to part of the plot of Witchmark.Â I loved that book so much and I read it first, so what should have felt like a surprising plot point felt like, “Oh, this again?”Â The books came out about just about the same time so it is just a coincidence but it decreased my enjoyment a bit.
Things that I’ll probably get yelled at on the internet for criticizing:
- Sometimes the supporting characters were very awkwardly introduced.Â The author was working hard to include characters from many different backgrounds which is good but it turned every character introduction into a descriptive list.Â It is a case of telling the reader instead of showing the reader through the character’s actions.Â For example, you wouldn’t necessarily be told when being introduced to your new boss what her sexual orientation was or that she was polyamorous.Â Maybe you would see pictures on her desk or it would come up in conversation later.Â Â
- Sometimes the plot seemed to be set aside in order for a lesson about identity.Â The worst instance of this was when Claire ran into a burning building, past a female-presenting witch who was setting the place on fire, and into a room where other witches were being held captive, in order to rescue them.Â The witches inside ask their friend is ok.Â Claire refers to her as “Fire girl” in her explanation.Â At that point, she is informed that the witch is agender and not a girl.Â My thought reading that passage was, “This is why conservatives laugh at us.”Â You are being rescued from a building that is literally on fire.Â You were trapped and needed a person with super strength to get you out.Â Now, while the fire is about to drop the whole ceiling on you, you take the time to admonish your rescuer for misgendering a person they literally saw in passing.Â Run first – then figure out the proper pronouns of strangers you’ve never spoken to.Â This book sometimes felt like an educational tome on identity more than a fantasy story.Â That’s fine if that was the author’s goal but I would have liked to see both aspects blended together more seamlessly.Â
The bread and baking would have caught my eye. As for the gender identifying business, sounds like a case of making the reader pay for the research. I read that somewhere where an author had to do so much research on a subject and instead of including pertinent points, “made the reader pay for it” by hashing out ALL the info. This author wanted to educate the reader about gender identification. I guess.
Shoot. I like the idea of the bakery / fantasy combo. The gender fluid character is a plus … but it sounds like the author is trying too hard to get in every diverse character there is. It’s a shame.
I think I’ll pass on this one. Thanks for the review.
OK, you convinced me — I’ll never read this book!!
best…. mae at maefood.blogspot.com